South Australian cricket officials are going to the Environment, Resource and Development Court to appeal an Adelaide City Council rejection of an application to build a permanent video replay screen at the Adelaide Oval.The council had given in-principle approval for the screen in January. As a result of that decision, the South Australia Cricket Association (SACA) worked with Heritage South Australia to ensure the design met their heritage requirements.SACA chief executive Mike Deare said the appeal was a last resort move after the Adelaide City Council took the issue off their agenda. Deare said he understood the matter would be looked by a special Development Assessment Panel later this week. He anticipated the panel meeting would then be followed by a conciliation meeting under the auspices of the Environment Resource and Development Court.When the original SACA plans were declined by the Council, a reduction was made in the support structure for the screen. Deare said he had received an indication that city councillors acknowledge the need for a screen and he is hopeful that the amended design will win favour within the next week.

Scorecard

For a few hours it was possible to suspend belief and fantasise that all was right out there, that England were on top of the world, and that the football season has been forgotten. A packed fifth-day crowd crammed into The Oval to see England blow away the South African tail inside an hour and then knocked off the 110 runs needed to win the match – and square the series – 41 minutes into the afternoon. The spectators, in a party mood from the fourth over of the day when Martin Bicknell struck twice in as many balls to dissipate South Africa’s hopes of mounting a rearguard, celebrated as if the Ashes had been regained.The hard work was done early on when England took the last four South African wickets to leave themselves plenty of time to chase a small target. The heroes were Bicknell, who was written off by some after the first day, and Stephen Harmison, who shared eight wickets in the innings, and all four on final day.Bicknell prised open the door in the fourth over with the wickets of Mark Boucher and Andrew Hall with successive balls. Bicknell toyed with Boucher, bowling him two inswingers and then the outswinger which Boucher was drawn into playing, and Alec Stewart held the thinnest of inside-edges. Boucher made 25 (193 for 7). The next delivery was one of Bicknell’s worst, almost a long-hop, but a slightly surprised Andrew Hall fended it away with hard hands and it dollied to Ed Smith at short midwicket (193 for 8).Those two quick strikes forced Shaun Pollock onto the attack. He launched into Bicknell, smacking him back over his head and then carving him twice to the third-man boundary for three fours. But in the next over he tried to steer a short, wide one from Harmison to third man, but it flew straight to Graham Thorpe at backward point instead (215 for 9). Pollock had made 43, South Africa’s lead was still under 100, and the crowd was in raptures.Paul Adams went for broke, cracking the tiring Bicknell for three fours to take South Africa’s lead past 100, but Harmison ended the innings with a brute of a ball which climbed on Makhaya Ntini, and Smith leapt to hold a diving, one-handed catch at short leg. Ntini had scored 1. Fifty-five minutes after he had led England onto the field to thunderous applause, Alec Stewart led them off it to an even greater reception.

As South Africa struggled to raise themselves one last time to save a series they appeared to have in the bag long ago, they needed the luck to go their way. It didn’t. In the second over Ntini produced a peach with turned Trescothick square, found the edge, and flew between second and third slip where Hall completed a wretched morning by spilling a waist-high chance. Heads visibly dropped as those flickering hopes of a dramatic finale disappeared.England had been largely cautious before lunch, but some looming, darkening clouds injected more urgency afterwards. Michael Vaughan fell straight after the re-start, but Butcher and Trescothick gorged themselves on some weary bowling, unleashing a string of boundaries to the delight of the crowd.The only thing that would have completed the fairytale end to the summer would have been for Stewart to have hit the winning runs. As it was, he had to be content with cheers every time the big screen showed him sitting on the players’ balcony. It was more fitting, perhaps, that the winning runs were hit by Trescothick, a man who is key to the future of the England team and one whose 288 runs were instrumental in this success. Only Don Bradman, with 244 and 77 in 1934, had previously scored a double-century and a fifty in the same Oval Test.Man of the Match Marcus Trescothick
England Man of the Series Andrew Flintoff
South Africa Man of the Series Graeme SmithWisden Day 4 Verdict: South Africa face Groundhog Day
Wisden Day 4 Bulletin: Harmison leads the charge after Flintoff’s fireworks

Robert Croft and Michael Kasprowicz have jointly become the Glamorgan Players of the Year for the 2003 season.The announcement of the decision was made at the annual awards luncheon held at the Sophia Gardens ground this afternoon. The award, sponsored by Brain`s Brewery, had never before been shared by two players.David Harrison won the Young Player of the Year Award, whilst wicket-keeperMark Wallace won the Byron Denning Clubman of the Year Award.

The escalating furore over the West Indies Cricket Board’s decision to massively hike ticket prices for the forthcoming home series against England took a new turn with news that the Barmy Army – England’s loyal band of supporters – are set to boycott the Caribbean in protest.The Barmy Army have been unfaltering in their support of England overseas for more than a decade, never failing to travel to venues others – including some players – have feared to tread. But the WICB’s ploy to raise money for cricket in the region looks as if it is an obstacle too far.”They [the Barmies] don’t like being treated like idiots,” Katy Cooke, the secretary of the Barmy Army, told The Guardian. “They’re being asked to subsidise ground improvements in another country. No one who went to Bangladesh is going to the West Indies. I know lots of people who were going to take their families out there, but it just isn’t worth it now, especially as the accommodation is already expensive. There’s been absolute outrage.”If we’d told Zimbabweans at the Chester-le-Street Test last summer that they suddenly had to pay more than the England fans to get in so that the authorities could fund some new seats in Durham, we’d have been branded racist pigs.”And the view that staying at home is the preferred option is echoed by Phil Long, another ever-present Barmy. “I’ve been following England abroad since 1996,” he told the newspaper. “But the trip to the West Indies will be the first I’ve dismissed on the grounds of cost. In Bangladesh you could get by on £150 for the entire five-week trip. Now we’re being asked to pay more for the tickets alone. A lot of the boys are saying we’ll give this one a miss.What’s happening is a real shame, because we’re the best touring fans there are. I was in Calcutta for the one-day final recently between India and Australia, and there were only about 10 Aussie fans there. We’re being penalised for giving such good support.”New Century Marketing, the London-based firm in charge of selling the tickets, continues to insist that sales for the four-Test series which starts in March are good.

New Zealand’s hopes of getting a good start to their women’s Test match with India at Vapi, took a blow, almost from the outset. Asked to bat on a pitch that offered little suggestion of how it would play, the lost two key wickets to disappointing decisions.Kate Pulford, one of the opening batsmen, was adjudged to have edged the ball behind when her bat was well away from the ball after only five balls and her fellow opener, Maria Fahey was given out caught bat-pad off her toe. The road to recovery was a slow grind and the scoring rate barely reached two runs per over throughout the 94 overs bowled.Katey Martin, who was one of six New Zealand women making their Test debut, settled in for the long haul. There was a significant disappointment when Maia Lewis, New Zealand’s captain, started aggressively but was caught out from the bottom edge for only nine runs.Martin was joined by Haidee Tiffen and they grafted their way to 81 before Martin, in sight of a half-century on debut, played back to Neetu David, the left-arm spinner, and was caught behind for 46, scored off 139 balls in 176 minutes of batting.The message was to build partnerships, but at every stage they seemed to be developing, a wicket was lost. Tiffen produced a monumental display of control, given her attacking bent, and by stumps she had batted for 264 minutes for her unbeaten 38.New Zealand were disappointed that they had not been able to score faster and at stumps were left in No Man’s Land on 141 for 7. The pick of the Indian bowlers was Nooshin Al Khadeer who took 3 for 36 from her 27 overs. Neetu David took 2 for 37 from 29 overs.

Adam Gilchrist refused to wave the white flag, but admitted that Australia would need a monumental effort to ensure that Steve Waugh’s farewell Test isn’t remembered as an ignominious defeat. “We never give up hope,” he said with a wry smile. “And we always give it our best shot.”Gilchrist reckoned that Australia, who have set the standards for everyone else to match in recent seasons, would need to emulate India to stand any chance of salvaging something from the game. “When we do get the chance to bat, we need to learn from the way they batted … very patiently and watching the ball closely.”Despite acknowledging that the team had been physically and mentally taxed, Gilchrist said that there was no dearth of spirit in the team. “We’ve stuck to our task, but have been undone by some outstanding batting,” he said. “And a few catches have gone down, which has been one thing that’s let us down this series. I’ve been as responsible as anyone else.”He rated the Indians as the toughest opponents that he had faced. “It’s been the toughest home series I’ve played in. It’s been a real challenge to find ways to get these guys out. It’s one of the best batting line-ups in the world, going back a long way.”Asked what India had done differently to other sides, he said, “What they’ve done is been able to bat for long periods against us. You could point to the absence of McGrath and Warne, and also to their exceptional batting. I think it’s been a bit of both. [Virender] Sehwag and [Akash] Chopra have also done a great job opening the batting.”As for the two men who meted out the punishment today, Gilchrist didn’t hold back on the superlatives. “VVS seems extraordinary each time we play him. We can’t work out why he then goes away, and is left out of the team [for the 2003 World Cup]. As for Tendulkar, it was inevitable that he was going to come good. He looked a bit tentative yesterday, but was back in the groove today. He looked like the class act that he is.”There was some disappointment at the booing directed at Stuart MacGill after he dropped both Tendulkar and Laxman during the course of the day’s play. “I can understand that there’s a lot of frustration at not being part of a fairytale, after all the hype going into the game. But it’s the soft option to boo, the cheap option.”Gilchrist played one of the all-time great Test innings, 204 not out, at Johannesburg two seasons ago, to set up what Waugh termed two days ago as the most impressive victory of his tenure. A reprise is needed tomorrow, or the day after, depending on when India close their innings, if Australia – and Steve Waugh – are to leave the SCG with anything more than tears and regrets.

India’s tour of Pakistan has been delayed by a week due to logistical problems, and will begin no later than the second week of March.According to a report by Rediff.com, Jagmohan Dalmiya, the Indian cricket board head, announced that security was also a reason for the postponement.”The tour will be delayed by about a week,” Dalmiya said. “It shouldn’t start later than the second week of March, but the team won’t be able to go earlier because we are trying to fully cover all points, security as well.”The Indian cricket board is expected to announce the tour itinerary on Saturday. India is due to play three Tests and five one-dayers in their first full visit to Pakistan since 1989-90.

Scorecard

Sachin Tendulkar emulated Inzamam-ul-Haq’s Karachi heroics with a dazzling 141, but it wasn’t enough to inspire India to an improbable victory after they were set 330 to win by Pakistan at Rawalpindi. Shoaib Akhtar, playing his 100th one-day international in front of his home crowd, winkled out India’s lower order as they fell 12 runs short at the finish.As long as Tendulkar was at the crease, India were favourites to pull it off. He batted magnificently, passing 13,000 runs along the way, and adding 105 with Rahul Dravid to set the game up for India. The slow bowlers were cut, swept and paddle-swept deftly, while the pace bowlers were creamed through the covers, and lofted over midwicket with ease.Ironically, it was that shot that proved his downfall, when he slog-swept Shoaib Malik down to Abdul Razzaq at deep midwicket (245 for 4). His 141 took just 135 deliveries, and gave the remaining batsmen the perfect platform to make a charge.Dravid eased to 36 before some extra pace from Mohammad Sami bowled him (260 for 5). And Yuvraj Singh then reeled off 19 in quick time before striking a Shahid Afridi delivery straight to Shabbir Ahmed at deep midwicket (282 for 6).With Shoaib back into the attack, Mohammad Kaif scooped one to point (284 for 7) and Zaheer Khan was trapped leg before first ball to leave Pakistan on the verge of victory. But Ramesh Power, the debutant, and L Balaji gave them a real fright, smashing 30 from just 15 balls to set up a thrilling climax. When Balaji was run out, and Ashish Nehra bowled by Sami, it was all over, with eight balls still to be bowled. The gallant Powar, unbeaten on 18, could only watch in frustration.Virender Sehwag and Tendulkar had started the pursuit by treating Shoaib with some respect, while going after Shabbir, who had come into the team to replace Naved-ul-Hasan. Sehwag went after him first, tonking one over midwicket and then smacking him over cover for four more.By then, Tendulkar had his eye in, as he proved when he cut Shoaib over point,before flicking him past the square-leg fielder. Shabbir then pitched one in the slot, and Tendulkar played a glorious cover-drive, following up with a clever glance off his pads for four more.

With India ahead of the asking rate, Shoaib struck with a beautiful delivery. It was full, and knocked back the off stump when Sehwag played around it (56 for 1).Soon after, India were rocked again, when VVS Laxman, who made just 4, was trapped leg before by Sami, as he tried to shuffle across the crease (71 for 2). Ganguly then enjoyed a reprieve, when Shoaib put down a sitter at mid-off after he had given Shabbir the charge.His luck didn’t last though, and when he gave Afridi the charge after a patchy 15, he was stumped by yards (140 for 3). That got Tendulkar and Dravid together. Singles and twos were scampered, despite Tendulkar appearing to suffer from fatigue, and fours plundered when the bowlers erred in line or length.Pakistan’s own run feast was the result of a stunning opening partnership. With Afridi back in the side, and back to his wood-cutting best, the new-ball pairing of Balaji and Zaheer were given a pummelling. Afridi started with an inside-edged four off Balaji, but then calibrated his sights to smash some splendid strokes straight down the ground and through midwicket.Yasir Hameed’s approach was more orthodox, with a couple of gorgeous cover-drives giving the Indians plenty to chew on. Only Nehra, who came on as first change, kept the runs down, as Ganguly was compelled to call on his slow bowlers.Sehwag, though, was targetted for special treatment, with Afridi slamming sixes over midwicket and long-off. Powar wasn’t scared to flight the ball, and he got appreciable turn at times. As for Yuvraj, he made an impact with just his second delivery, inducing a reckless heave across the line from Afridi, whose rollicking 80 had taken just 58 balls (138 for 1).Yousuf Youhana compiled an elegant 24 before Yuvraj struck again. Youhana played outside the line, and edged one back on to his stumps (191 for 2). But Inzamam came in next, and thumped Powar for a straight six, as Pakistan appeared on course for a huge total.The next break came courtesy some calamitous running. Hameed, who made 86, played one to short third man, and by the time he responded to Inzamam’s call, Nehra’s throw to Yuvraj had beaten him (225 for 3).That set the stage for Nehra. Included only after a late fitness test, the first ball of his new spell bowled Inzamam (28) off a thin edge, and the next trapped Moin Khan in front for 0. Malik jammed down on a superb yorker to ensure that there would be no hat-trick.Nehra’s intervention proved only a temporary respite as Younis Khan – who made 28 before tickling a catch behind off Nehra – Malik and Razzaq, the consummate finisher, took Pakistan past 320 with aggressive running, cleverly placed shots, and a little help from Indian fumbles in the field. It proved to be just about enough, despite an unforgettable knock from Tendulkar.

Eagles 185 for 5 (Bosman 84*) beat Dolphins 181 for 5(Sugden 50, Klusener 63*) by 4 runs
ScorecardAfter losing the toss and being asked to bat first in front of 8,025spectators at Kingsmead, the Eagles smashed the highest total of the Standard Bank PRO20 Series. Thanks to Loots Bosman’s undefeated 84, they racked up a total of 185 for 5, with the last 100 runs of the innings coming off 8.1 overs.Boeta Dippenaar and Nicky Boje set the tone of the innings, with both batsmen scoring at better than a run-a-ball. Bosman came to the crease at 55 for 2 after eight overs and a high total was already onthe cards. But he took the bowling by the scruff of the neck, smashingsix fours and six huge sixes, two of which ended up on the roof ofthe stadium. His 84 was scored off only 44 deliveries and he wasinvolved in a 78-run partnership, in six overs, with Benjamin Hector,who madde 29 off 17.In reply, the Dolphins needed a solid start, but disaster struck when they lost two wickets in the first two overs. Craig Sugden, back in Durban after a stint with Border, picked things up with 50 from 35 balls, before holding out to long-on. Lance Klusener thenstrode to the crease with the Dolphins’ hopes squarely on his shoulders.His 50 came up in 26 deliveries, but needing 24 off the last six balls was always going to be a big ask. Jon Kent managed two fours and a single in the first three balls, and Klusener two fours and a two thereafter, but he finished stranded on 63 from 30 balls. The Dolphins should have got him in earlier.

Abhijit Kale, the Maharashtra batsman who was accused last year of offering bribes to two national selectors, has been banned by the Indian board (BCCI) until December 31 this year. Kiran More and Pranab Roy, both members of the national selection committee, had complained that Kale had offered them a bribe last year to ensure himself a place in the Indian squad to tour Australia. Kale had denied the comments.However, the Maharashtra Cricket Association (MCA) is planning to ask the Indian board to reconsider the decision. Speaking to Wisden Cricinfo shortly after the announcement, Dynaeshwar Agashe, the chairman of the MCA, said: “If he has not given any bribe this is a very harsh decision. He has already lost one season of cricket and suffered last year. So we are going to request the BCCI to reconsider the decision. If the evidence is inconclusive, this punishment is too much.”Agashe also said that the Maharashtra selectors would not hold this against Kale, and would continue to pick him if he is fit and can find a place in the side on the merit of his consistent performances.A BCCI enquiry was then instituted, which completed its investigation recently and submitted its report to the board. According to the television channel, NDTV, Kale has given a letter of apology to the BCCI, in which he admits that he tried to “influence the selectors”, while insisting that he had never tried to bribe them.Kale’s letter said: “The entire episode has unnecessarily tarnished the image of the board. I accept that it was wrong on my part to influence the selectors by approaching them directly or through my parents. With regard to the issue of offering money to the selectors, I wish to state that I was misunderstood and I assure you that I had no such intention. I tender [an] unqualified apology for my said act.”The BCCI, not having enough evidence to hand Kale a harsh sentence, has, thus, decided to ban him for a year, with the sentence beginning retrospectively, and thus running till December 31 this year. Jagmohan Dalmiya, the board president, justified the punishment, saying: “The disciplinary committee unanimously felt that although a strong case of offering money was made out against Abhijit Kale, no extreme or severe punishment should be given to him in the absence of direct proof.”However,” he continued, “there [has] been cogent proof of Kale trying to influence the selectors directly, or through his parents, which he has admitted in his unconditional apology letter. The disciplinary committee held Kale guilty of gross misconduct and indiscipline. Taking into account Kale’s personal future career and his unconditional apologies as well as the suspension that he had undergone since November 21, 2003, the disciplinary committee decided that he should remain suspended till December 31, 2004.”Dalmiya also had a word about the complainants. “In addition to this,” he said, “the disciplinary committee also felt that the two national selectors, More and Roy, should have intimated Kale’s attempt to influence them forthwith to the board, instead of delaying it. The committee recommended to the board [the idea of] framing a code of conduct for the selectors in the future.”More, one of the selectors who accused Kale, said that he welcomed the decision and respected the board’s judgment.